directed by Steven Spielberg

Film directors shouldn’t make their autobiographies – here, I said that. Why? Oh well… I was really excited about today’s film because it’s a semi-autobiographical story of Spielberg when he was a teenager and started his adventure with filmmaking. Obviously, since it’s not a documentary, we do have different characters and elements that perhaps aren’t true, but in the end the general story is based on the director’s own memories. Little Sammy (Mateo Zoryon Francis-DeFord) goes to see his first ever film in the cinema with Mitzi and Burt – his parents (Michelle Williams & Paul Dano). After that evening, he becomes obsessed with… trains. That somehow leads to his new hobby, which is filmmaking (and how – that’s for you to see, not going to spoil). Teenage Sam (Gabriel LaBelle) spends all his savings and free time on creating new scripts and shooting new little productions of his. In the meantime, he starts getting to know his parents more, as he becomes a meticulous observer of what’s around him. Soon, he realises that life is definitely not one of his films and certain things are out of control. In my eyes, it’s a very emotional family drama that is definitely moving, yet I find difficult associating it with Spielberg. I mean, I know it’s not a documentary, but since it is partially fictional, why isn’t the fiction part a bit more engaging? I have to say that for the whole 2,5h I was asking myself “is it really a Spielberg’s film?” We do have beautiful shots, we do have a great cast and quality acting, we do have the score by John Williams… so where’s Spielberg? My theory is that the problem of this production is the screenplay. I feel like this project was too overwhelming for Spielberg as he had to present his own childhood, but still show respect to his family and attract the audience. And something didn’t go well there… The moments where he presents Sam shooting his films are very much his style – cheerful, rapid, adventurous, surprising and entertaining. However, the dramatic parts look as if someone else put them there without consulting it with the director. They are way too long, certain conversations are, in my opinion, unnecessary and I feel like we get no added value with numerous scenes. Does it mean Spielberg cannot do drama? No, he can do that very well. Just in this case, he was telling his own story in a partially fictional way and I think he just got lost in the process. It’s definitely not his best work, but I feel like very few directors are able to tell their own story – because filmmakers’ job is to present stories of others, not of themselves. Still, in the end I do recommend you to see this production because it’s a quality film after all. It also shows how difficult it is to become an artist, especially if your reality is not as you wish it was. A big surprise for me was Seth Rogen (as Sammy’s uncle), who is rather associated with silly comedies, but here, we may see him in a totally different role, for which I’m giving a big plus. There are numerous gags and small allusions, which made me laugh at loud, and if you’re a fan of Spielberg, you’ll enjoy them as well. And I’m also very excited for this cooperation between Steven Spielberg and Paul Dano – two marvellous film people who deserve to create together – and we will be thankful for their work for sure. Since it’s my last recommendation of 2022, I’d like to finish with the most important message that every filmmaker should keep in mind: “When the horizon’s at the bottom, it’s interesting. When the horizon’s at the top, it’s interesting. When the horizon’s in the middle, it’s boring as shit.” Cheers!
My rating: 7/10
S.








