directed by Timur Bekmambetov

How much don’t I understand film critics? Thiiiiiiiis much! I mean, I understand, we all have our preferences, but modern sci-fi is definitely one of the most underrated genres. In case you’ve seen today’s film and its ratings – here’s a sign for you to watch it no matter what! Especially if you’re a fan of sci-fi stories. I mean, this production is such a gem that I’m surprised I even have to defend it… Anyway, let’s go! We move forward to 2029 where AI is now used as judges in court. Fun, huh? Since AI is deprived of basic human empathy and emotions, its decision-making process is based purely on facts. This way it’s considered 100% objective, especially since AI has the access to literally everything – from city cameras to people’s phones. The film begins with Detective Chris Raven (Chris Pratt) waking up tied to a chair and taking part in his own trial. His wife has been murdered and Chris is the main suspect with the guilt probability of 97,5% (calculated by AI). In the next 90 minutes, he must prove to the artificial judge that he’s innocent. Otherwise, he will be executed in this chair. Chris claims that he didn’t kill his wife, but all the provided evidence says the opposite. So, is he lying or is someone trying to get rid of him? Say whatever you want, but the idea itself is magnificent. Some critics are complaining that Christ Pratt is basically just sitting throughout the film, but… what did they expect? It’s a story about a man in a trial. Would they complain that a film about a sailor is shot entirely on a ship? Give me a break. Besides, such roles are even more demanding, because you have limited ways of expression. In my opinion, he nailed it. Just like Rebecca Ferguson who plays the role of the AI judge. She also cannot express too much since she’s not a human character, yet you may feel a whole range of emotions watching those two. Besides, the protagonist is actually facing the consequences of his own actions, and I’m not talking about the potential murder. He was a supporter of AI trials, but now he’s the defendant, who experiences how it is to prove yourself not guilty. No matter how clever one is, it’s a battle against AI – which has unlimited resources and cannot save you out of pity. Also, if AI has a proof, it doesn’t reflect on the case further, even if the proof might be misleading. I spent so much reflecting on this topic after watching “Mercy” and I’m shocked that critics haven’t appreciated it enough. I really hope you will give it a try and improve its ratings.
My rating: 8/10
S.








