You prefer things to be comfortable or true? “Men” (2022)

directed by Alex Garland
© 2022 Entertainment Film Distributors. All Rights Reserved.

Some people say it’s a really lame horror. Some others say it’s a disgusting production for feminists. Well, I think it’s a very intriguing film that you should definitely see and I hope that today’s post will encourage you to it. Before I move to the plot, I have to admit that the title made me chuckle a bit – a horror titled “Men”. Oh yeah, already creepy. But jokes aside, this film is actually some serious extension of that thought of mine. We get to know Harper (Jessie Buckley) who has recently lost her husband, James (Paapa Essiedu). The man committed suicide, which deeply impacted Harper. That is why she’s decided to rent a house in a tiny village and spend some holiday there clearing her mind. The situation is a bit more complex as Harper wanted to divorce James and they weren’t anyhow perfect together, so her grief is very specific. Would you miss a person who used to be your abuser? And that’s not the only difficult question that may come up during this film. Even though Harper is spending the holiday in the middle of nowhere, she still bumps into random local men. I’d like to say that they are strange, but if I think about it – most of them are just typical men you may meet everywhere. Perhaps just because the film itself creates this uncomfortable atmosphere you may have an impression that those guys are somehow overacted or unrealistic. And as I mentioned at the beginning – men can be a real horror we normally don’t notice. If you’re a man reading this post, let me just assure you that I do not blame only men for all the mess that happens in the world. However, this film is mainly focused on showing how sick and harmful patriarchy is. Each of the men that Harper meets in this story is different, yet all of them manage to use their power to manipulate and harm the female protagonist. I have to say that the ending wasn’t really my thing and I was hoping for something slightly different (although visually – it was disgustingly wonderful), but the whole production definitely caught my attention. I didn’t know what this story was actually about before watching, so I really enjoyed experiencing this patriarchal rollercoaster together with Harper. Well, “enjoyed”. After, I’ve read some reviews and I feel like this film is a real drama starter. Funny fact is that it’s not hated only by men or more conservative groups – lots of feminists disliked it in some way as well. From my side – I loved how fresh it was, meaning it wasn’t another copy-paste production that I won’t remember in a month. And no matter whether you agree or disagree with its messages, I guess you can admit it is quite original in its form. When it comes to the story… let me put it this way: been there, done that. What you see in this film isn’t surprising for women. Being treated as an object that belongs to a man? Check. Being manipulated by a man to make you feel like you’re the abuser although clearly you’re the victim? Check. Being ignored by men because they rarely take you seriously? Check. Being called a “bitch” just because you refuse something? Check. It’s not just a film screenplay, it’s reality of millions of women. Once again, I’m aware of the fact that women are not perfect either and they may maltreat another person as well, but explaining men’s, or anyone’s in fact, behaviour by saying “others do that too” is below shallow. If you’re a woman who sees herself in Harper, let me just send you a virtual hug right now. And if you’re a man who feels disgusted by the men presented in the film, let me just say “thank you for being”. But if you’re a man who doesn’t see anything wrong in this patriarchal picture, then I hope you find help and love one day. I’m not rating this film high because I did hope for something else at the end, but generally – it’s a great production to wake up our minds and I hope it’ll wake up yours as well. Let’s hope all those apples fall down eventually.

My rating: 6/10
S.

Dancing on the edge of a volcano. “Fire of Love” (2022)

directed by Sara Dosa
© 2022 National Geographic Documentary Films. All Rights Reserved.

If you’re still in some Valentine’s Day mood but you’re not a fan of classic rom-com love stories, I’ve got something for you! I’d like to introduce you to an extraordinary couple that shared a lot of love towards each other, but also towards their common passion. Katia and Maurice Krafft were French volcanologists who didn’t think twice when it comes to exploring one of the most mysterious and dangerous creations of nature. I hope you won’t consider it a spoiler as it’s known from the very beginning of the film – both of them died, yet the tragedy is mentioned at the end, so that’s something I’m not revealing here. I was myself quite curious how this power couple lost their lives, especially since there were way too many occasions in their career. The documentary is very much based on their own footage as they were also recording their adventures and studies. I have to admit that I never heard of them before seeing this production, but apparently, they have made a significant impact in the world of science. They were going to places where most people would never even think of staying close to. They were bringing samples back to labs, providing scientists with more specific knowledge on the topic of volcanos. As we learn from the documentary, the couple weren’t wealthy or anyhow privileged, so they lived a rather simple life at home in order to spend the saved money on their next expeditions. I enjoyed learning about Katia and Maurice because they seemed to be a wonderful marriage, where both sides share a passion and support each other no matter what. During their trips, they were looking after each other and, as much as each of them was a very intelligent and brave individual, I’m sure they wouldn’t have done all that without the other person by their side. I believe that support of the other partner was crucial in their development process and I’m glad those two ran into each other at some point in their lives. Thanks to them, many people gained the access to more knowledge, video and paper educational materials, and perhaps also some inspiration to join them in exploring volcanos. It is also proved that thanks to the couple’s work many people were saved from the consequences of eruptions that had been estimated some time before. Besides, I don’t know if it’s because they spent too much time way too close to lava, but watching their interviews in the documentary I could feel this wonderful warmth from both of them. I really believe they were good people. And ambitious passionates. And dedicated partners. So if you want to learn something new and meet a real power couple, that’s a film for you to see.

My rating: 7/10
S.

A fake laugh is like a fake orgasm. “The Ugly Truth” (2009)

directed by Robert Luketic
© 2009 Sony Pictures Releasing. All Rights Reserved.

Is it our favourite forced holiday? Yes, it is! Let’s buy heart-shaped cards, have some heart-shaped chocolates, drink overly sweet drinks in heart-shaped glasses (I bet there are such somewhere) and… learn the ugly truth. Today’s recommendation is a romantic comedy, but as much as I avoid romantic comedies (unless I’m in Bridget Jones mood), this one is my absolute favourite. We get to know Abby (Katherine Heigl), a morning show producer. She’s a very attractive woman, yet still single as she’s looking for her prince charming. Her dates are rather awkward because she takes compatibility very seriously – for example, ordering bottled water is already a red flag. Why? She’ll explain it several times in the film. One evening, Abby gets to see a TV show called “The Ugly Truth” where a man named Mike (Gerard Butler) talks about relations between men and women without a pinch of politeness or any kind of correctness. He also manages to burn Abby on-air. Can it get worse? Of course! Her TV station has hired Mike, hoping his way of being will improve the ratings. Even though Abby is a hopeless romantic and control freak, and Mike is a horny arrogant with too much confidence, at some point they decide to cooperate. Especially when Abby meets Colin (Eric Winter), a handsome surgeon who seems to be her prince charming that she’s always dreamed of. In order to catch his attention and make him fall in love with her, she asks Mike to help her in playing this male-female seduction game. I’ve rewatched this film many times because it’s really enjoyable and full of my kind of humour – a bit dark, sometimes dirty, spiced with sarcasm. I also adore the character of Mike who’s definitely not a man that we would see in a romantic comedy. He and Abby make a wonderful contrast that shows how differently we perceive relations. One side may want to hold hands, read poems on the terrace, drink wine by the fireplace, and the other side would screw anything that moves and never call back. And somehow we have to coexist in this world. I hope you won’t consider it a spoiler, but the point of this film is to show that there has to be balance everywhere, especially in relationships. There has to be some intimacy and love, but also some spice and fun. Otherwise, it’s not gonna work. And that’s exactly what I wish you – find a person that will help you balance your life. And if you’re taken, make sure you have this balance in your relationships. Quoting: “You have to be two people. The saint and the sinner. The librarian and the stripper.” And that, my dear readers, is the ugly truth.

My rating: 9/10
S.

Niceness doesn’t last. “The Banshees of Inisherin” (2022)

directed by Martin McDonagh
© 2022 Searchlight Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Aye, aye, aye, today, I’m taking you to Ireland, my folks. It’s time to recommend you an Irish gem nominated in many categories by the Academy, including the Best Picture. Does it deserve the main Oscar, though? Here comes my honest opinion – not really. And if you feel furious right now, you have to read my post till the end (ha, gotcha!). The film is a black comedy/drama directed by Martin McDonagh, the one who also gave us “In Bruges” (2008) – and thank you very much for that, sir! This time, we’re moving to a fictional Irish island in the 1920s, during the Irish Civil War, which is not really that visible there, on Inisherin. The small community seems to be enjoying their slow and peaceful life, including two best friends – Pádraic and Colm (Colin Farrell & Brendan Gleeson). Until one day, when Calm decides to end their friendship and doesn’t want to share any single moment with Pádraic. At first, his friend thinks it’s just a bad period of time or a joke, but days are passing and Calm’s behaviour doesn’t change. Suddenly, the friendship break-up becomes an issue which involves the whole community of the island, as there are people who would like those two to be friends again, and such who enjoy this little twist in their life. So shortly speaking, it’s a film about two men having an argument. But the film is not that shallow at all, quite the opposite. It touches the topic of loneliness in a quite fresh way for the cinema, I’d say. Plus, Colm points out having lost the meaning of his life and how he wishes to become significant for the world, which isn’t really happening if he continues to daily drink and chat with his buddy. That one hit me the most, because I guess each one of us has a moment in life where we start questioning the point of doing what we do. And the point of even being here. Would the world lose much if we weren’t here? And as depressive as it sounds, the film actually shows us that there is a very important reason for us to stay, be present and be happy about our existence. But I cannot tell you why – it’s for you to learn this lesson from the film. I’ve also seen some people sharing that this film is an analogy to how ridiculous Irish Civil War (and any kind of war, as a matter of fact) was. Meaning that people who shared the land, the culture, the family and friends – suddenly became worst enemies. In the film, the conflict is perhaps less drastic and way funnier, but the idea is pretty much the same and the question screams at us from the screen – what is this for?! Just like I and hopefully many of you think of wars – what for? This film is definitely thought-provoking and makes you reflect a lot on numerous philosophical questions, but it’s also full of this absurd kind of humour that I personally like. So why don’t I see it as the winner? Well, I’m not sure. Perhaps it’s because I expected much more and at some points the film disappointed me. Also, it’s a film focused on talking – and I personally believe we should get back to making films, not podcasts with pretty visuals. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a film I’m definitely recommending, but I wouldn’t be that thrilled to see it represent 2022 as the Best Picture. But that’s just my opinion, so feel free to see it differently. However, an absolute Oscar from me goes to Barry Keoghan. Mamma mia! People are praising Farrell and Gleeson? Good, but look at this guy! He had only few moments to shine in this film and he caught my attention 120%. Marvellous performance and I really hope he’ll continue his acting career with a golden guy on his shelf. And remember – perhaps niceness doesn’t last, but it doesn’t mean it’s worthless.

My rating: 7/10
S.

Time destroys everything. “Irréversible” (2002)

directed by Gaspar Noé
© 2002 Mars Distribution. All Rights Reserved.

As much as I know that Gaspar Noé is a very controversial filmmaker, I cannot stop adoring his work. Each of his films is an experience I’d love to immediately forget after finishing watching just so I can rewatch the film again and experience it one more time. And one more time. And one more. Today’s recommendation is for those who like experimental cinema and feel mentally and physically prepared for difficult pictures. Those who’ve seen “Memento” by Christopher Nolan might see some resemblance in the form, yet “Irréversbile” is, in my opinion, way easier to understand while watching it for the first time. I can’t believe I’ve just said that, but it is true that Nolan’s productions are very much complex and often illogical after the first screening. I feel like Noé’s style is not difficult to understand, yet you need to have a very open-mind and have your limits of all kinds rather flexible. Getting back to today’s recommendation – it’s unusual because of the way we have the story presented. It’s divided into several pieces and we watch them in reverse order, so we know what happens at the end and now, as viewers, we wish to learn about all the preceding steps. It seems quite strange for me to tell you what it’s about considering the fact that it’s the point of the film to keep such a secret, but here’s a small introduction: two men, Marcus and Pierre (Vincent Cassel & Albert Dupontel) get into trouble as they were trying to find the person that had hurt a woman they knew (played by Monica Bellucci). And that’s it, the rest is for you to see. However, since I do want to share my opinion about one scene, here’s a *SPOILER ALERT*. So, those who’ve seen the film may already know which scene I’m talking about – indeed, the rape scene. It’s one of the most horrifying scenes I’ve seen in my life. I’m speechless about how well Noé presented the horror of this act of crime. The scene lasts nine minutes and there’s no editing (only at the end). Just two actors, camera and… action. In fact, this particular scene was essentially directed by Bellucci herself, yet it was coherent with Noé vision. This one scene speaks louder than anything I’ve ever seen on the topic of rape. I hate saying that, especially since I obviously despise people who commit such crime and I sympathise with all the victims, but this scene is magnificent when it comes to acting, directing, visual effects and general impact it has on viewers. Chapeau bas. *END OF SPOILER* I also have to add that visually this production is stunning, but I guess it’s obvious when it comes to Noé’s style. He loves when his work is aesthetically shocking – and to me it’s pleasing. So much. I don’t want to scare you, but this film may cause the feeling of anxiety not only because of what you’ll see, but also what you will not hear. Let me explain – they used extremely low-frequency sound in the audio, which normally is not possible for us to hear, yet physically our body may response to it. Such sound may even cause nausea or dizziness, so if you’re watching the film with a quality sound system, better watch out. That is why he’s one of my beloved film directors; he doesn’t just make films – he creates pieces of art. I’m aware of the fact that he does “support” himself with substances that are, let’s say, not generally accepted  – and I’m definitely not a person who would recommend you going this way – but I’m not here to judge him as a person. I want to see good cinema and he provides it. And that’s all I need to know. So if you’d like to take part in an artistic experience that may impact you a lot, you know what to watch now.

My rating: 8/10
S.

Tomorrow doesn’t exist. “Fursat” (2023)

directed by Vishal Bhardwaj
© 2023 Absolute Productions. All Rights Reserved.

Call me old-fashioned but I still miss the times when the phone was just for calling. Texting? Writing a letter. Selfie? A photo camera. Music? A walkman/discman. And in case you lost one, you could still enjoy other activities. Now, if someone loses their phone, it’s the end of the world. Apocalypse! Everything’s gone! So this addiction to our smartphones is creeping me out, yet there are moments when I appreciate technological progress. Today, I’d like to recommend you a short film made by Vishal Bhardwaj, which was fully shot using… iPhone 14 Pro. Yes, a phone. And if you’re sceptical about its quality – well… you may be surprised. But hey, every film has a story, so I have to introduce you to the story of “Fursat” as well. We’re following a young man named Nishant (Ishaan Khattar), who’s found some ancient tool that allows him to travel in time. He becomes absolutely obsessed with it, but at some point he realises that the more he plays with time, the less he focuses on his beloved one – Diya (Wamiqa Gabbi). It’s a short film, so I cannot tell you too much not to spoil it entirely, but it’s not a typical Bollywood love story. We get some action, some adventure, some sci-fi – and all that accompanied by marvellous choreographies and music. I’m a Bollywood fan so I’ll always admire their aesthetics, despite often predictable storylines. Yet, what dancers in this film do is a wonderful spectacle, so you shouldn’t be disappointed. And getting back to the iPhone part – I was amazed by some shots and I believe they would be more difficult to organise with a classic video camera. So if we have such technologies, why not using them? I give my thumb up! And I also hope that if you’re an amateur filmmaker with interesting ideas for films but you feel like lack of equipment and money is stopping you – try to get some inspiration from such projects. There are numerous filmmakers who have everything you can think of and yet they end up making rather disappointing films. So if you have a good idea, grab your phone and make it happen. A good idea and a spark of filmmaking talent will always win with any kind of expensive equipment, trust me. And for those who’d like to watch “Fursat”, just click the title – it’s available for free on YouTube. May your day be full of time travel, dancing and iPhones.

My rating: 7/10
S.

We will fix you. “Atrabilious” (2023)

directed by William Atticus Parker
© 2023 River Styx Productions. All Rights Reserved.

Today, I’d like to put a spotlight on the film that may not only entertain you or/and confuse a lot, but also let you look at the concept of grief from another perspective. Or perspectives, depending on how much you’ll be overthinking. The beginning already puts us in “look out, you may not fully get what’s happening” mood, but then we are introduced to the story of Steven (Leon Addison Brown), a man who has recently lost his son. He’s trying to move on with his life, but the horrible grief doesn’t make it easier. Soon we get the first plot twist, which is a spark of hope – Steven’s son might not be dead at all. Why? How? That’s for you to see, no spoilers as always. But here comes the most important place that will be the centre of most unusual events of this story – Steven goes to Atrabilious, a bar. Well, not just a bar – the bar where everyone struggling with some personal loss of theirs may find support. And the longer Steven stays there, the more he starts believing that his child might still be with us. If you expect me to tell you what genre this film is, I have to say: all of them. Obviously, we have some mystery to solve, but then, what happens in the bar is sometimes quite surrealistic. Add a pinch of dark humour and voilà – here’s your cinematographic drink called “Atrabilious”. I have to say that I got intrigued by the story from the moment Steven went into the bar for the first time and then my overthinking process began. I feel like I wrote hundreds of possible scenarios in my head and was just waiting for the final scenes to tell me which one was right. Fun fact – none of them. Or maybe not? You see, I can’t reveal how it all ends – that would be brutal – but I can guarantee the ending is for you to create. For sure, you may reflect a lot on the topic of grief and how one may deal with it. Is it even possible to move on? This film will not give you answers, but definitely throw even more questions at you, which later you need to analyse yourselves. I am indeed shocked that such a young director (who’s not even 20 years old!) has managed to tell a story that really burns your brain and is full of hidden elements to be put together by the viewers. This film is like a box of puzzle which, in the end, may show different pictures depending on who was doing it. And I like it! I also have to add that I noticed quite unusual camerawork in some moments (which is a plus) and good music (which is another plus). Also, here’s a cherry on top for older cinephiles – we may see Hunter Parrish and Will Parker playing together in one production, which to me, a fan of “Weeds” series, was a heart-warming experience. Anyway, make sure to remember “Atrabilious” and stop by for a cinematographic drink one day.

My rating: 7.5/10
S.

Chaos is my home. “My Old School” (2022)

directed by Jono McLeod
© 2022 Dogwoof. All Rights Reserved.

If you’re generally not a big fan of documentaries, perhaps this one will change your mind. I found it by accident and didn’t have any high expectations, but ended up watching it with my eyes wide open, so let’s say – it’s catchy! Maybe some of you know the story of Brandon Lee and watching this film won’t surprise you that much, but if you don’t – do not google it! Just play “start” and enjoy what you see. You won’t regret it, I swear. The main star of the documentary is indeed Brandon Lee, who agreed to be interviewed, yet not filmed. That is why we may see Alan Cumming lip syncing to Brandon’s audio interviews, which is already a quite unusual experience. Personally, I’m a big fan of Alan Cumming and he did a marvellous job in this production, especially since the story is more than complex and Brandon himself is a rather mysterious person. Except listening to his interview, we may also see the man’s old classmates and teachers, who are more than happy to share their memories about the school times. Brandon is remembered as a very bright student, who was always willing to help his classmates in studying. He was very active during lessons and sometimes knew more than his teachers, which was highly admired. Brandon made many friends at school and everyone was impressed how well he managed life considering the fact that he’d lost both of his parents and was being raised only by his grandmother. However, it wasn’t difficult to notice that Brandon seemed to be older than his peers. Yet it didn’t matter to most of them as he was a perfect student and a friend to his classmates. But as you might be guessing, there’s a quite shocking secret that Brandon was hiding. I never heard of him before seeing this documentary, so I was indeed speechless when the secret got revealed at some point. I had to pause the film and verify whether it’s actually a documentary and not some fictional story, because I swear, I wouldn’t come up with anything like that myself. And obviously, I’m not going to spoil it to you. Yet I have to mention a few things that are a big plus of this production. First, Alan Cumming and his lip syncing performance – marvellous. I think that choosing him for this role was such a perfect idea. He generally seems like a rather mysterious person, so his appearance and body language were adding to this character. Second, we don’t only get to see people remembering Brandon, but there are also animated visualisations of what the interviewees describe. It makes the documentary more entertaining and visually attractive, in my opinion. Third, the story may seem to be quite funny, but if you look at it from Brandon’s perspective, it actually presents a real drama that many young people have to go through. How much one can do to make their dream come true? And in case of failing, they are left on their own, with no goals to achieve anymore. As much as I understand people being shocked and somehow frustrated about what Brandon did, I also feel a lot of sympathy towards him, especially knowing his real background story. You haven’t seen such documentary for sure, that one I can tell you. So give it a try and let it surprise you.

My rating: 7/10
S.

What is a soldier without war? “All Quiet on the Western Front” (“Im Westen nichts Neues”, 2022)

directed by Edward Berger
© 2022 Netflix. All Rights Reserved.

I have to admit that I was rather sceptical before watching today’s film. It’s because I’m a bit tired of continuous adaptations instead of creating fresh productions. “All Quiet on the Western Front” by Erich Maria Remarque had already had two film adaptations, one of which won two Oscars (Outstanding Production and Best Director). I’ve seen that first adaptation from 1930 and, indeed, it’s a film worth your time, just mind the fact it’s been almost 100 years since it was made. Plus, as the novel itself is culturally and politically significant, I’m not surprised that production was the winner back then. So, since we already have such cinematographic gem, what’s the point of making another one? Well, here I come saying: thank you holy spirits, tooth fairies and anyone above us for making this film happen. To make things clear, I’m not saying it’s an absolute masterpiece, but I do believe it’s needed. For those who haven’t read the book or haven’t heard of the story, it’s about the German soldiers who were fighting in World War I. The novel is very much appreciated mostly for its anti-war messages coming from it, especially for the indirect accusation of manipulating and murdering thousands of young men purely for political reasons. In the film, we’re following yet a teenager named Paul (Felix Kammerer), who enlists to fight in the War together with his friends. Even though we have a protagonist, I feel like we experience the story from all possible perspectives on the way. And the reason why I’m glad this film was produced is because we really need constant reminders about the ridiculousness of wars. Forgive my honesty, but I do believe there’s nothing to be proud of in leading your people to battles. In the novel and both adaptations (I haven’t seen the one from 1979) we may see how lost all those youngsters were in that situation. They were often not aware of what’s happening and what it takes to be on the front. Authorities were manipulating them to believe it’s a matter of respect towards their country and they should be proud of joining the army, while all those boys were was a human target for the other side. For what? Nothing more valuable than a human life, if you ask me. And I’m glad that we refresh such stories and make them visible to people all around the world. I also have to admit that I was thrilled how meticulously this adaptation was made, with all the details, short scenes that speak for themselves (for example the one where Paul receives his uniform and notices a label attached to it – I had chills), wonderful camerawork and editing. I know that it’s quite strange saying it considering the theme of this film but it’s truly beautiful from the technical point of view. And perhaps because it’s so perfectly done, it hits even harder with the content it presents. Plus, I’m sure more younger viewers will decide to see this one instead of the two previous adaptations because it’s more accessible and visually attractive. So, in the end, I’m glad this film happened. Do I wish it an Oscar? I don’t know. But I wish you to see it and reflect on the lesson we apparently haven’t learned as humanity.

My rating: 7/10
S.

Everything is happenin. “Space Is the Place” (1974)

directed by John Coney
© 1974 North American Star System. All Rights Reserved.

If you need a film that will cheer you up on this gloomy Monday, then search no more. Let’s jump into a spaceship and listen to some good jazz, shall we? And I mean – literally. Today, I’d like to recommend you a sci-fi film from the 70s, which blew my mind and made me have the time of my life. In this one, we’re following Sun Ra (played by himself), who lands on some mysterious planet together with his band the Arkestra. Discovering the planet, he feels like it’s a way better place to be in and he comes up with an idea to bring African Americans to settle there. That is why Sun Ra flies with his spaceship to Oakland and starts encouraging young black-skinned people to join him. And what’s a better way to unite people than through music? That’s it! If you’re frowning right now while reading my post, then let me assure you – you’re not alone. When I played this film, I was feeling like in a hidden camera and waiting for someone to jump out to say it’s all a big joke. Well, it’s not. It’s an actual film of 85 minutes, which may really confuse you, but at some point, if you trust it enough, you may start enjoying the atmosphere a lot. As I mentioned before, it’s a sci-fi production, but a lot of people seem to consider it as a semi-documentary since Sun Ra was an actual person, a real artist, who was not only a talented jazz musician, but also a performer. He loved experimenting with music and visuals, and was a true icon of the African American music stage. You have a chance to see a film being a representative of Afrofuturism, which as you might be guessing, is focused on exploring the culture of Africans through technology, science and philosophy. For a long time in history, black-skinned actors weren’t taken into consideration while making films in many countries. And if so, their roles weren’t significant or anyhow valuable, quite the opposite. That is why they needed to create their own art to promote and spread their culture. Nowadays, we’re fighting for more equality, so we may see very different representatives in world wide cinema. Still, such cultural gems are definitely worth seeing, because they let us fully immerse in realities that are unknown to us. Personally, I love such experiences. This production was an awesome adventure not only because I’m a fan of jazz, but also because it’s so abstract and full of positive vibes, that there’s no way you won’t be enjoying yourself at the end of it. I’m not saying you’ll be fully aware of what’s happening – because neither was I – but it’ll make you smile for sure and that’s already a plus.

My rating: 7/10
S.