This society will stop at nothing to protect male fantasies. “Tokyo Idols” (2017)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Kyoko Miyake
© 2017 Kyoko Miyake. All Rights Reserved.

Today’s recommendation is quite challenging. On the one hand, I don’t want to recommend it, on the other, perhaps it’s better you see it yourselves. I’m taking you to Japan where you’ll have a chance to meet true idols. Those are young women who make sure to please men, yet not in a sexual way. Or at least… not directly. The idols dress up and act like little girls – they wear cute dresses, do ponytails, giggle at everything they hear and generally act like human dolls in a bigger size. They make sure to stay in touch with their fans because they are the main reason those women do what they do. The idols perform on stage in front of hundreds or even thousands of people. In their free time, they organise streams where they simply entertain their viewers – still, not in a sexual way. At least not directly. You may think there’s nothing wrong about that, in the end, in our times, it’s quite common to take part in concerts or watch people online. What the filmmaker points out in this documentary is the fact that the majority of fans following our adorable idols are men. Grown-up men. Men who are even older than their own fathers. And that’s the moment when you start questioning literally everything you see in this film. As I said before, the women do not offer any sexual content, yet their way of being as idols is attractive enough for their followers. The men admit that they are fascinated by the performers’ purity, innocence, delicacy and… virginity. What’s more, the fans have a chance to meet the idols, which is a very popular practice. Taking a selfie or holding hands with one of the ladies is a huge dream that numerous adult men share there. Not sure what you think of that, but to me this is incredibly disturbing. First, these men are not ashamed of their fantasies and the fact that watching an idol is the only way to satisfy their romantic/sexual needs. They admit that it’s difficult for them to find a woman in their age and start any kind of relation. Second, the idols are aware of this toxic relation between them and their fans because they even sing about their lack of social skills and inability to make healthy connections. And those men are happily hopping to such lyrics without any deeper reflection. Third, how would you feel if your daughter was such idol? Just think about that because an idol’s parents were asked to share their opinion and what they answered might surprise you. It surprised me for sure. This documentary is terrifying despite its glamorous and overly sweet shots. As a person who really cares about the well-being and safety of children, what is being popularised in Japan is toxic and outrageous. Everything’s fine if the idol is over 18 and all that takes place during a concert or on her private channel between her and the fans. But what if this practice encourages these men to start following and admiring little girls, under 18? They like human dolls, cute voices, virginity and all that – so what would stop them? I don’t know. I’m too disgusted to think of that. Additionally, these young women are so focused on pleasing their fans that they don’t need any other ambitions. Being seen and appreciated is their only fuel, which makes me question the future of younger generations. This documentary hit me hard, I’m telling you.

My rating: 6/10
S.

Whatever happened to just good old regular coffee? “They Came Together” (2014)

SashLeave a comment
directed by David Wain
© 2014 Lionsgate. All Rights Reserved.

I feel like we all need a little break from difficult topics, right? That is why today I’m recommending you a really cool comedy that many people underrate, in my opinion. In this film we get to meet Joel and Molly (Paul Rudd & Amy Poehler), a couple that is having dinner with their friends and during that they are telling the story of their first meeting and relationship. Molly had a little candy store and was living her dream, but then a huge corporation making sweets showed up on the other side of the street and Molly knew it’s the beginning of the end. Sounds familiar? No? Then wait. Joel worked for that company which was about to destroy Molly’s dream so their relation was already quite doomed to failure. Now, sounds familiar? Still no? Oh boy… do you even watch romantic comedies? Anyway, if you get what they are referring to, I can already explain – this is a parody of typical rom-coms. I feel like a lot of people took this production too seriously, while not even its crew did. I mean, the film is made perfectly, but everything you see there is a big joke mixed with tons of absurd. Personally, I was laughing at loud each time they were mocking rom-com stereotypes because, let’s face it, such films are very much copy-pasted. Besides, Amy and Paul are an awesome acting couple, which you can see in this film. Separately, they are brilliant, yet together – it’s something we don’t deserve, I swear. Great chemistry that made me cry several times, so I’m actually sad it’s not a series they’re starring in. Today’s post is shorter because this film shouldn’t be described any further. It’s hilarious, it’s full of very good actors, it’s made in a smart way and it’s relaxing. So if you ask me – that’s all I’d need for a weekend afternoon. I believe many cinephiles may actually appreciate it – let me know if you did! Enjoy and may the power of rom-coms be with you.

My rating: 7/10
S.

I’m so busy! “After Work” (2023)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Erik Gandini
© 2023 Fasad Production. All Rights Reserved.

I was pretty sure that if I let you choose what kind of recommendation I should post between a documentary and anything else you would choose anything else. How surprised I am to see that a majority of you voted for a documentary… so I guess I’m recommending one today. You want, I provide. By the way, do we have any unemployed readers here? Or maybe those who are tired of their jobs and wish to change them? Or maybe those who love what they do and life couldn’t be better? Well, whoever you are and whatever you do, this documentary is definitely worth your time. It focuses on the topic of work, its meaning in our life and how various forms it may have in different parts of the world. The director lets us meet several individuals, each of whom has a different job and thanks to that we may learn about their perspectives. This production shows how ridiculously our world is organised when it comes to employing people. There are those who work 15+ hours a day and barely have time to sleep because that’s the pressure which is put on them by their employers and society. But there are also those who are employed just for the sake of being employed – just to sit in the office and do absolutely nothing. For what? For money. You may think the second option sounds better. Well, to me both cases are examples of modern slavery. In our world, you can do anything with people as long as you offer them money for that. And somehow, we don’t think about our honour, our value or even our passions – getting any job means we’re already fine. I’ve got a job, I can’t complain – this kind of thinking is way too common. Millions of people are being used, underpaid, disrespected and treated like puppets. You may have heard this popular sentence “work is not your whole life”, but isn’t it? I mean, on the average, we spend at least 8 hours at work. It’s 1/3 of our day. Then we sleep for at least 7-8 hours. Let’s do some basic maths, shall we? We’re left with 8 hours a day to be ourselves. To do what we love, to spend time with our families, to have fun, to rest, but also to take care of our duties. 8 hours. And some people don’t even have that. In this film we also have a chance to reflect on younger generations who decide not to work at all. They simply want to have fun and live thanks to the income of their parents and grandparents. We could get judgmental (or jealous, name it yourself) here, but isn’t it a way of standing against this worldwide paranoia? What’s more, this documentary also focuses on the technological development and how it already affects employees all over the world. We, people, are already being replaced by machines who can do our work better, faster, more efficiently and perhaps even cheaper. So what will happen to us in the future? People are still coming, still being born, yet, as we can see, job opportunities are more and more limited. This documentary is a huge bowl of food for thought and I hope you’ll find a moment to grab a piece because it may push you to making more conscious decisions about your professional life. If only it’s possible.

My rating: 7/10
S.

I didn’t have power. “Subject” (2022)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Camilla Hall & Jennifer Tiexiera
© 2022 Lady & Bird Films. All Rights Reserved.

Documentary is a very specific film genre. Some people don’t want to watch them because they’re stereotypically considered boring, which may be fair as their role is to present a piece of reality and in the end we go to the cinema to escape it. Some others watch them to expand their knowledge on the world and learn the perspective of someone/something else within approximately 2 hours. Personally, I’m a huge fan of documentaries because I get to see things I may never be able to see with my own eyes and thanks to the filmmakers I actually can. Today’s recommendation is also a documentary, but quite different from the ones you might have seen. Camilla Hall and Jennifer Tiexiera, the directors, decided to put a spotlight on the subjects of documentaries, meaning the people who have been portrayed in numerous productions. You don’t have to have a big experience in watching this concrete genre to understand the point, but if you do watch documentaries, you may spot many familiar faces and shots. How are documentaries even made? First, we learn about some event or person that is worth examining further. Then, we either have time to work on the screenplay or simply grab a camera and start shooting, depending on the circumstances. Finally, we edit the film and release it. What happens next is simply out of our control, even if we’re the filmmakers. What I mean by that is you never know how popular your work may become. Perhaps it’ll be seen by your family members and a small group of friends, but maybe it’ll win the main award at a prestigious festival and ends up being the most watched documentary in the world that year. Que sera, sera, right? And when you’re a filmmaker, it’s your conscious decision to produce such piece and take the responsibility of whatever comes next. However, have you ever wondered what happens to the subjects of documentaries when they go viral? Today’s film is exactly about that. The ladies let us hear the voice of people who are the subjects of certain documentaries and they share their perspective. I have to admit that I never reflected about it as I was always admiring documentaries as pieces of art and sources of information. But what about those ordinary people who later have to carry the weight of publicity on their shoulders? When you’re a cinema person (actor, director) and they make a documentary about you, perhaps it’s not easier, yet somehow it’s rather inevitable in your profession to stay anonymous. However, in most documentaries, we get to see ordinary people who later become public figures and they are completely unprepared for that. I don’t want to share too much because I believe it’s best for you to watch this film and hear it from the “subjects” themselves. Still, this documentary really opened my eyes and made me feel slightly disturbed about the fact that I’m a documentary fan. Is it even right for me to like such productions knowing how much damage it may cause to certain people? On the other hand, as long as I’m not a hater and I don’t wish to hurt anyone, that’s my way of learning about them and their cases, so maybe I shouldn’t feel bad about it? In the end, they agreed to be filmed, yet the filmmakers could have acted more ethically correct and inform about possible consequences. But then, we wouldn’t have received many great documentaries. So, what’s the price of such film? I guess I’ll be thinking about it for quite some time. Feel free to join me.

My rating: 7/10
S.

Anyone can make their future whatever they want it to be. “Back to the Future Part III” (1990)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Robert Zemeckis
© 1990 Universal Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Three films later we’re finishing this wonderful series. At the very beginning I have to admit that the last part is my least favourite, but it’s still marvellous. I’m just allergic to westerns. And since in this film Marty goes back to 1885, we’re ending up in the world of horses, cowboys and ridiculous moustaches. In case you haven’t seen previous parts, spoilers are coming. So at the end of the second part Marty (Michael J. Fox) receives a letter from Doc (Christopher Lloyd), from which he finds out that the man is safe and sound, but far far far away in the past. The boy shouldn’t be travelling there, but who can stop our naughty McFly, am I right? Especially since he finds a tombstone which says that 1885 Doc was/will be (using correct grammar writing about this series is such a challenge…) murdered 6 days after writing the letter. So with the help of 1955 Doc, Marty goes back to 1885 to save the man. And as you might be guessing, we get another portion of hilarious jokes. One of my favourites is definitely the fact that Marty introduces himself as Clint Eastwood. I mean, genius. Don’t get me wrong, this part is fantastic – funny, exciting, well-written and well-acted, but comparing to the first two, I have to rate it a bit lower. However, what I appreciate about this part is that we got a totally new idea for the story. In the first part we moved back in time, but just a bit. Then in the second part we focused on the future. So what about the third part? They could have kept on travelling to similar years, but it wouldn’t have been that interesting anymore, even though the crew is incredibly creative. Travelling to a more distant future could have turned out quite tacky, because they would have to come up with even more modern and extraordinary objects, which doesn’t always work as we know from some sci-fi productions. Choosing 1885 and more of a western form was the best option, especially since Marty and Doc fit there perfectly with their crazy ideas and adventurous way of being. In fact, Zemeckis liked the idea of presenting the Old West already at the beginning of creating the series, but waited with it till the third part. Awesome decision, if you ask me. Besides, *SPOILERS COMING* I honestly appreciate how they finished the series. Marty learns his lesson to give up on stupid people and focus on himself, Doc finds love and his place in the world (or time), we get a lovely message at the end saying that future isn’t written yet – what else could we ask for? I mean, they could have created a time machine in the form of a flying locomotive… oh wait, they did. So yeah, check, check, check. I’ll say it once again – I’m incredibly thankful for this series because it’s a perfect example how to make quality adventure films. Michael and Christopher are such a magical duo that I’m always moved to see them together after years during some events or conferences. They still share those awesome vibes and we can tell they are true friends. Thank you Robert Zemeckis for taking us for such a long and phenomenal trip. It won’t be forgotten.

My rating: 8/10
S.

Where we’re going, we don’t need roads. “Back to the Future Part II” (1989)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Robert Zemeckis
© 1989 Universal Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Continuing our week with Robert Zemeckis, today’s a reminder to see the second part of “Back to the Future”. In this one, they are not really getting b-a-c-k to the future, they’re going there for the first time. I mean, to the new future… the more distant future… You get it, right? This time, Marty (Michael J. Fox) and Doc (Christopher Lloyd) are going to 2015 (which was a really distant future back then), where they need to stop Marty’s son, Marty Jr., from getting in trouble. Somehow they manage to save little Marty Jr., but the big Marty is so blinded by what the future looks like that he decides to profit from being in 2015. He buys an almanac (annual publication) with all the results of the most significant sport events from 1950 to 2000. This way, when they get back to the 80s, Marty will be able to earn some money on betting. Unfortunately, something has to go wrong, right? We have to have some plot twist. Biff (Thomas F. Wilson), known from the first part, notices the two main characters and decides to realise Marty’s plan before him. Biff goes back in time to give the almanac to his younger self and then gets back (are you even following?) to 2015. When Marty and Doc finally travel back to the 80s, they end up in a totally different reality they left before travelling to the future. The rest is for you to see (or remember). I have to admit that for a long time the second part was my favourite of the series. Maybe it’s because I was fascinated by the way they’d presented future and it was just more entertaining. Now, living in 2023, I can definitely say that the first part is for the win. Am I getting old? Am I already old? I have no idea, but the first part wakes up some deep nostalgia in me and I’m thankful for that. However, the sequel is still a masterpiece in my opinion, so I’ll be defending it. First, I love the fact that they didn’t cast any actors similar to the main characters – all children, parents, grandparents are played by the same actors, which makes it even more ridiculous and entertaining at the same time. Second, I’m a huge fan of the way they presented future. All the ideas, all the little details, all the jokes about how things may look like in 30 years – that’s just precious. Especially now, as we know exactly what 2015 was like. Besides, have you noticed how positive Zemeckis future was? Many filmmakers, writers, artists present their predictions in rather dark shades, while Zemeckis just made it all look fun and worth waiting for. For example, the hoverboard – come on! I’m in 2023 and I’d like one! By the way, do you know how they managed to trick us with it? Because how is it possible that they had a functioning hoverboard in the 80s while shooting the film, and we don’t have it now? Well, the secret to it is… do you want to know? Do you REALLY want to know? Well, fine, you’ve been warned – the actors were hanging on wires (later erased in post-production) while the hoverboards were simply attached to their shoes. Magic taken away? Welcome to adulthood. Anyway, not to sweeten too much, I have to say I didn’t like the character of Jennifer being so involved in the story. However, I guess I wasn’t the only one. If you remember, the first part ended with Jennifer joining Marty and Doc in the car. Zemeckis wasn’t planning to make any sequels, but after the huge success of the first part, it would have been highly irresponsible of him to leave us without any more adventures to see. Still, since Jennifer was in the car, she had to go to the future as well… I’m not saying it’s such a tragedy, because in the end her character was involved in a very creative way, but I have to complain about something, right? Anyway, make sure to watch this part and try to forget I revealed the hoverboard secret to you.

My rating: 8.5/10
S.

I guess you guys aren’t ready for that yet. “Back to the Future” (1985)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Robert Zemeckis
© 1985 Universal Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Since recently the documentary about Michael J. Fox has been released, I felt the need to rewatch all three parts of “Back to the Future” and I cannot imagine my blog without posts about those three masterpieces. That is why, we’re starting a week with Robert Zemeckis and his works of art that have become legendary productions and the reason for oldies to shed a tear. May I just say that Robert Zemeckis should have some temple where all cinephile could go to and thank for his stubbornness? I mean, talent and creativity as well, obviously, but he’s an incredibly stubborn man as well. Can you imagine that his idea for “Back to the Future” was rejected more than forty times? Forty! And yet, when he offered the main role to Michael J. Fox, the actor couldn’t take it as he was busy with another project. You know what Zemeckis did? Kept on being stubborn. He actually chose a different actor, but after shooting several scenes he couldn’t see his ideal McFly, so he insisted on Michael joining the crew, even though it meant losing money on re-shooting some scenes. Insanity? Perhaps, but don’t we appreciate it now? So if you start some petition for that temple, let me know. Anyway, I’m aware of the fact that my readers are of different ages so maybe there are some who haven’t seen this series of films. Today, I’d like to recommend you the first part, which was released in 1985. We get to meet Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox), a teenager from a rather miserable family, however, he seems to be doing quite fine. He plays the guitar in a band (which isn’t that famous, but hey – at least it’s fun) and has a wonderful girlfriend who supports him in succeeding in life and not following the example of his parents and siblings. Marty also has a quite extraordinary friend – Emmett Brown (Christopher Lloyd), shortly called Doc, who’s a scientist and asks the teenager to meet him at night. And what happens then is the beginning of a fantastic adventure. Doc presents his time machine which is DeLorean car (because travelling in time should also be cool and fancy), but right after doing that, he gets killed by terrorists. Terrified Marty tries to drive away to save himself from the gang, but after reaching 142 km/h he goes back in time to 1955. Now, the teenager has to get back home to 1985, save Doc and also make sure that his parents fall in love with each other. Otherwise… there might be consequences. Seriously, if you ask me for my favourite adventure film from the 80s, this is the title I’m going to shout. I’ve seen it numerous times and it never disappoints in entertaining me. When it comes to the casting, we all know the story about Michael now, but what about Doc? You know that the role was supposed to go to John Lithgow, but since he was unavailable, Christopher Lloyd was the one to get it? All I can say is that I’m thankful for Mr. Lithgow for having other projects, because there’s no better 80s duo than Doc and McFly, and they have to be Christopher and Michael. Besides, if those two wonderful actors hadn’t done so well, we wouldn’t have “Rick and Morty”, the series that so many people adore these days. I admit, I haven’t watched it (yes, shame on me), but it was in fact inspired by the duo from “Back to the Future”. However, even though it’s an adventure film, please make sure to watch it closely, because the filmmakers put a lot of effort in leaving tiny allusions and jokes that can be understood only if you really pay attention. I hope you’ll find as many as it’s possible and enjoy watching or rewatching this masterpiece. And all I can say is – to be continued…

My rating: 9/10
S.

I’m already on the bus. “Still: A Michael J. Fox Movie” (2023)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Davis Guggenheim
© 2023 Apple TV+. All Rights Reserved.

I was really looking forward to seeing this documentary as I’m a fan of Michael J. Fox and I was simply curious how well (or how badly) they managed to present the amazing person he is. And you know what? As much as I’m tired of all those biography productions, I can definitely say this film is an example how to make them. If you haven’t followed Michael J. Fox much or/and you haven’t seen his performances, don’t you worry. This documentary takes us back to the beginning of his career and explains every step very clearly. He started as a child actor and that was already the time when he knew what his path should be – acting. For those who are familiar with his work it won’t be a surprise to learn that “Back to the Future” directed by Robert Zemeckis was Michael’s milestone and after releasing the first part, he suddenly became incredibly famous. Sounds great, right? A young man who had to work hard to make his dreams come true finally gets appreciated and his career looks promising. Unfortunately, reality can destroy the most beautiful plans. At the age of 29, so at the very peak of his career, the actor gets diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. From that moment, Michael has to struggle with more and more visible symptoms, which is even harder considering he’s constantly being watched. How can you stop a shaking hand when you’re in front of the camera? There’s no switch to turn it off and then, at home, turn it back on again. Even though I’ve watched this documentary and heard him telling about the struggle, I still cannot imagine what a nightmare it was to him hiding his disease. You can see in his eyes how passionate he was and is about his profession, how much he doesn’t want to give up and how much it cost him to continue acting. But you know what? Despite all this, Michael is an absolute optimist. He’s a fighter with a constant smile on his face, even if smiling is now more difficult for him to achieve. The disease has a big influence on all parts of his body, including his face. But when he speaks to the camera, I still see those sparks in his eyes that say more than his disabled body language. Speaking of technicalities – as Michael tells you his story, we can see his younger self in films doing similar things to what he tells us about. The way they managed to choose those scenes and then, edit them in the way that we feel like watching a documentary and not a complication of his performances as an actor – that was brilliant. It was actually very much reminding me of the 80s style of telling stories (in the end that’s when Michael was shining the most on the screen) and, even though it’s a documentary about a seriously ill artist, I felt so peaceful and relaxed. As if he was saying “I’m fine, don’t worry about me, we’re gonna figure it out”. Marvellous production and I hope filmmakers specialising in documentary will follow this example.

My rating: 8/10
S.

I’m not a girl. I’m a woman. “Dalva” (2022)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Emmanuelle Nicot
© 2022 Hélicotronc. All Rights Reserved.

Today, I’d like to recommend you a film that may stay with you for a long time. I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect from it before watching, especially since its subjects cannot be considered as easy ones for sure. In the end, I left the cinema speechless and convinced I have to write a post for you about it. The main character that we’re following in this story is Dalva (Zelda Samson), a 12-year-old girl, who’s taken away from her abusive father. The man has been manipulating his daughter for years making her believe that whatever he does to her is absolutely fine. Dalva, despite such a young age, differs from her peers, which becomes even more obvious when she moves into a foster home. Her appearance and choice of clothes visibly don’t match her age, but also her way of thinking and behaving seems incredibly mature. For us, viewers, and all the adults involved in the girl’s case it’s not difficult to understand that Dalva’s father is a criminal and has been hurting his own child, but the 12-year-old has her own perspective. She’s so trusting, empathic and devoted to her father that she truly believes he didn’t do anything wrong. On the one hand, it might be caused by the constant manipulation, on the other, perhaps Dalva hasn’t learned about other and much healthier relations between a parent and a child. That is why she loves her father the way he is because that’s the only possible scenario of their relation she can imagine. In the foster home, Dalva has a chance to meet other teenagers and learn how to be a 12-year-old, although all her new friends there have also been through a lot, so the communication and interaction between them are also quite specific. Personally, I was stunned by this production. First, because of the main idea of showing deeply manipulated and abused child so peacefully. Watching this film you kind of feel like Dalva herself – as if nothing wrong has happened. But you know that it’s not true, so you’re literally fighting with yourself and your own emotions. There are several genuinely funny moments in the film, but after laughing at them I had this tiny alarm going off in my head reminding me that it still is a terrifying drama. Why am I laughing? Should I be laughing? This production really plays with your emotions, but I loved it for that. Second, I was absolutely amazed by little Zelda, who wasn’t much older than her character at the time of shooting. Her role was demanding and I bet many adult actresses wouldn’t have done it better than her, so chapeau bas and I can’t wait to see Zelda in next productions. And lastly, maybe you’ll be surprised to read it, but to me none of this film’s elements is pointless. What I mean by that is every character, every dialogue, every shot – they all mattered. And I’m even more thrilled knowing that it was the director’s debut, which means she has some natural intuition about making quality productions with engaging stories. Mer-veil-leux! One of the best films I’ve seen this year and you know how picky I can be, so this is my honest opinion and recommendation. Don’t you dare miss it.

My rating: 8/10
S.

Freedom! “The Blind Man Who Did Not Want to See Titanic” (“Sokea mies, joka ei halunnut nähdä Titanicia”, 2021)

SashLeave a comment
directed by Teemu Nikki
© 2021 It’s Alive Films. All Rights Reserved.

Today, I’d like to recommend you a film that amazed me by its form and which stands out from most modern productions. Finnish cinema is quite unusual and I believe it’s not for everyone. By that I don’t mean you shouldn’t watch their productions – totally the opposite, films are for whoever wants to see them, but Finnish style may not attract such big audiences. Still, I hope my post encourages to check out this title as it was a real surprise to me. We get to know Jaakko (Petri Poikolainen), a Finnish man living on his own. He’s blind and in a wheelchair, which makes his world very much limited. Jaakko does have some support from a caregiver, but other than that he’s stuck in his flat. Luckily, the man has some company because he’s in constant contact with Sirpa (Marjaana Maijala), a woman living far away but calling him on a daily basis. Those two have a very strong chemistry despite struggling with serious problems in their lives. When Sirpa shares some updates about her health condition, Jaakko decides to travel to his beloved one and support her in person. But, as you might be guessing, that won’t be easy since he cannot see and needs to be in a wheelchair. The background in the film is totally blurred, so we get some idea what it’s like not to see clearly. As a person with myopia – I confirm that’s how we see without glasses. Obviously, a blind person doesn’t see anything or they faintly see some shapes, but keeping the whole film with a black screen would make it a podcast, so I actually appreciate the director for choosing the blurred option. The camera is mostly focused on Jaakko’s face despite all the actions happening around him, which doesn’t make the film anyhow less interesting. I was fascinated by this slow pace and some kind of intimacy that they created. Except presenting how difficult it is for people with disabilities to function in their everyday life, this film also reminds us that they still want to feel independent and self-sufficient. It’s clear that a blind person has some limits, yet there are many other activities that such people are often excluded from. One of them is definitely falling in love. I’m afraid there’s this strange idea that people with disabilities aren’t searching for partners, don’t want to have families or don’t even wish to please themselves in various ways. As if their difficulties were the reason why they should ignore all their inner needs. This film screams “absolutely not!” – we all deserve to be loved, supported and appreciated. And we all deserve to feel like we’re the only ones who can make decisions about ourselves. Yes, people with disabilities need help in some activities, but the decision whether something should be done or not is always theirs. Period. This film is about the freedom that many disabled are fighting for and I hope the world opens up to them. I was stunned by the simplicity of this production, which makes it unique and worth remembering. Additionally, there’s an important piece of information that you may hear at the end of the film, so make sure to wait for it. Perhaps it may make an even stronger impact on you as a viewer.

My rating: 7/10
S.