There’s one winner and no finish line. “The Long Walk” (2025)

directed by Francis Lawrence
© 2025 Lionsgate. All Rights Reserved.

It’s a film about walking. Period. Can’t remember more accurate title of a film to be honest. It’s literally a looooong walk. But I’m still writing about it, which means I liked it, right? Right. And I believe you should try it as well. Before watching the film, I actually decided to read the book it’s based on. The title is the same and it was written by Stephen King, under his pseudonym Richard Bachman. I like to read books first, because then I can imagine the story myself. However, if I watch the film first, later, I just see the same pictures while reading. So I grabbed that novel and hoped for a fun ride, but instead I got incredibly bored. The general idea is amazing, but the way it was written – it was really difficult to keep on going. Even though the book is pretty short, it took me a long time to finish it. So I was quite discouraged before watching the film, but luckily, the adaptation is way better! We move to some alternative times where the US is in a huge economic crisis. Therefore, any way of earning money for living is worth trying. Any. In order to give people a chance to improve their life and also to entertain everyone, there’s a long walk organised. 50 young men (in the book there are 100) voluntarily sign up to walk nonstop across the country. Sounds easy? Well, there are some rules to follow. You cannot stop, you cannot walk slowly, so basically you cannot rest. And if you do, you get a warning. What happens after the 3rd warning? Well, the volunteer finishes the walk… and his life. Where’s the end of this? Simple – wherever the one before last dies. There can only be one winner. So as I said, I loved the idea for this story. To be honest, that’s exactly how I imagine the future – people will be doing anything to survive. Perhaps such long walks become an actual tradition… You may think it’s insane to sign up for something like this, but if the prize is huge and can significantly improve your life, then you don’t think twice. However, if you don’t like reflecting on such future, I may also share that to me this long walk is a metaphor for coming of age. All the volunteers are young men who see it as a competition, but then, during the walk, they start learning life lessons – both heart-breaking and uplifting. Just like in life. And it kind of depends on you how you walk your way, but there’s also a lot that cannot be controlled. Wait, is it again a depressing interpretation? Damn, I guess it is. Anyway, the film is much better than the book (I’m sorry Stephen/Richard), because I actually felt engaged in the story and not bored by the fact they’re just walking. Also, the ending is different in the film and, in my opinion, waaaay better! So if you haven’t read the book, you may skip it. But if you have and didn’t like it, then give this adaptation a chance. I hope you won’t be disappointed.

My rating: 6/10
S.

Clowns should be served only in Curry. “It” (2017)

directed by Andy Muschietti
© 2017 Warner Bros. Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Surprisingly, I had huge hopes for this film. I liked both the book and the first film-series based on Stephen King’s “It”. Therefore, I thought such re-make with the modern technology we have now would be spectacular and I would watch it with 3 blankets on my face. Unfortunately, it was quite disappointing. Maybe I expected too much or it really isn’t the best re-make. This post is absolutely personal and subjective, so if you did like the 2017 version, I’m happy for you. If you don’t know the story at all, let me write a few words about it. It all starts with a little Georgie (Jackson Robert Scott) who is playing with his paper sailboat in the street. Accidentally, the toy goes down a storm drain, where the boy meets Pennywise the Dancing Clown (Bill Skarsgård). The creature bites his arm off and the child disappears with him. Or I should say with “It”. Later, we follow the brother of missing Georgie together with his friends. The group tries their best to find Pennywise and Georgie, who is believed to be still alive. So basically, “Stranger Things” and a creepy Clown. The story is pretty basic, but, when it comes to the book, those were the descriptions by King which kept people feel anxious the whole time. When it comes to the series from 1990, I think the biggest applause should go to Tim Curry. I know that choosing between him and Bill Skarsgård is like the discussion “who is the best Joker from “Batman”?” I’m sure there will be different opinions. Personally, for me Tim Curry was quite natural. I know it sounds ridiculous considering the fact he played a creepy clown-murderer, but I felt no lie in his behaviour. And when it comes to Bill, he overacted the character. For me he was trying too hard to be Pennywise and it looks cheap, in my opinion. I believe that a good horror character should be the one who just appears on the screen and already gives you goosebumps. They don’t need any special effects to make us feel scared. So definitely 1990 Pennywise wins in my eyes. But I’m waiting for the second part. I’ll definitely give it a try.

My rating: 4/10
S.