If there’s certainty, there’s no need for faith. “Conclave” (2024)

directed by Edward Berger
© 2024 Focus Features. All Rights Reserved.

I watched this film some months ago, but I wasn’t sure whether I should write about it. On the one hand, I find it a quality production, on the other, I knew that if I wrote about it, I would have to mention the topic of religion and it’s something I’d prefer to avoid. But considering the fact that we’ve just witnessed a real-life conclave, I feel like it’s a good time to remind you about this film. Perhaps some people from Vatican wouldn’t like to put a spotlight on it, but here I am to put the whole arsenal of lights. As you might be guessing from the title, this is a story about a conclave that has to be organised due to the death of the pope. If you’re not a religious person, let me just add that a conclave is the assembly of cardinals (so very important men in Vatican) who elect the pope. So the film starts with the death of the last pope and such meeting has to be organised to choose a new one. And that’s where the rollercoaster of mysterious events begins. You see, a lot of people, especially very religious ones, may believe that those men there are truthful, with pure hearts and only best intentions. However, this story shows that no matter whether it’s presidential election or pope election – there’s drama, there’s conspiracy and there’s business. Because even if all those cardinals wear beautiful costumes and carry a Bible everywhere, they are still people and people are almost always the same. We may observe how different approaches to religion and faith those candidates for the new pope have and what they do in order to win in the end. And sometimes, they do things that perhaps wouldn’t be praised by the man they normally believe in. This film is very intense and presents what’s there, behind the closed doors. From the cinephile point of view, it’s wonderful because of two main reasons to me. First, the camera work. The shots are quite unusual and sometimes the camera is way too close to the actors, which has its pluses because we may feel even more overwhelmed by the actions and the emotions. And yes, I find it a big advantage, because the point of this film is to make us feel uncomfortable about what happens there on a daily basis. Second, the cast and the acting – it’s marvellous and I’m definitely not surprised about those Oscar nominations because they were well-deserved. Perhaps if the Academy members had watched all the films, they would have voted for “Conclave”. But as we know, the only job they have as those members hasn’t been done properly so far. Let’s hope they’ll actually see what they’re voting for before next year. Back to the film, from my personal point of view it is an important production, because it shows something that a lot of people ignore or pretend not to see. I’m not religious and yes, I am against religious organisations, because I believe they do not use their potential in the right way. What they proclaim is incredibly noble, but at the same time, I see no actions along with that. When I see all those men in expensive costumes and gold rings telling us to take care of others, while the only ones they care about are themselves, then I’m sorry – I prefer to be an atheist who gives a hand to those in need. I don’t need any religious label to be a decent human. I don’t need to read any fat books to know that if someone is hungry, we should feed them. I wish the same number of people who watched yesterday’s pope election could at least for a moment look at the ones in need and perhaps do something good. That’s what the world needs. Anyway, enjoy the film and maybe reflect on the reality we’re living in.

My rating: 7/10
S.

Leaping and dancing! “Footloose” (1984)

directed by Herbert Ross
© 1984 Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

It’s hard for me to believe there’s an adult on this planet who doesn’t know this film or at least the most popular song used in it. In case you’re an alien who hasn’t heard of “Footloose” or, even worse, you’ve learned about it just because of the 2011 remake, this post is for you. I’m not saying remakes are always Devil’s work, but I believe one should know the original film to appreciate its remake. Especially since the main character in the 1984 version is played by Kevin Bacon. And it’s a musical, so… think. Young Kevin Bacon playing a bouncing rebel. Doesn’t it sound perfect? But okay, for those who have no idea about the story, let me explain it from the beginning. Ren McCormack (Kevin Bacon) is a teenager who has just moved to a small town from Chicago. Soon he realises that the reality in Bomont is totally different from what he’s used to. Dancing and listening to rock music is banned by the city council. Obviously, it doesn’t stop Ren from doing what he wants, so he tries to find ways to keep having fun. He meets Ariel (Lori Singer) who pretends to be an angel around her strict father (John Lithgow), but in the evening she turns into a party animal. But dancing should be done in groups and music should be loud, so how can they keep doing what they love in a town where it’s illegal? You may be smiling because of such a silly story, but it’s actually happened. Okay, maybe not exactly like it’s presented in the film, but in Elmore City, Oklahoma, they also banned dancing. They did it because of heavy drinking and to prevent young people from having sexual intercourses with each other. So we may be laughing at this now, but people used to think this way. Some of them still do. Somehow dancing and listening to loud music is automatically associated with alcohol and sex. I’m not saying those things don’t go together sometimes, but it’s not a rule. That’s why we need more rebellious films like “Footloose”, but until then, let’s enjoy this oldie. However, to finish the post with an interesting fact I can tell you that it was possible for Tom Cruise and Madonna to play the roles of Ren and Ariel. Can you imagine that? Maverick with “Like a Virgin” in the background… that should be banned forever.

My rating: 7/10
S.